Category: Plague

Security Theatre, or Worse

Dr. Byram W. Bridle, PhD is banned from the University of Guelph campus for being COVID unvaccinated in spite of his being naturally immune. That would make a lot more sense to him if he were not an immunologist.


Aaron Kheriaty, MD, like Bridle, has had COVID, but of course that does not matter.

UC Has Put Me on Leave for Challenging Their Vaccine Mandate

The University seems to be attempting to force him to resign:

…the current administrative designation, where I am neither able to work at the University nor permitted to pursue work elsewhere, was not a development I had anticipated. The University may be hoping this pressure will lead me to resign “voluntarily,” which would remove grounds for my lawsuit: if I resign prior to being terminated by the University, I have no legal claim of harm.

Who Knew Spikes Could Hurt

Bret and Heather 78th DarkHorse Podcast Livestream: The Good People Game (at Salk Spike discussion)

Note that the link in the first paragraph: “(which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines)” to Spike Protein Behavior was not included in the Salk article originally, when Bret and Heather looked at it. They response is below. There is also some discussion of the possible lab leak and some pedantic ranting against common meaning of “theory”.

Bret and Heather 79th DarkHorse Podcast Livestream: #NotAllMice
David H. Gorski does not think so.
COVID-19 Primarily A Vascular Disease
Perspectives on the Pandemic | “Blood Clots and Beyond” | Episode 15, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D

Alex talks with Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph about new peer-reviewed studies that suggests there may be terrifying reasons side effects such as heart inflammation, VITT, and other serious issues may occur in those who have been vaccinated.
How to save the world, in three easy steps. — Weinstein, Malone, and Kirsch discuss spikes, among many other things.

In case YouTube disappears the above:

Byram Bridle’s claim that COVID-19 vaccines are toxic fails to account for key differences between the spike protein produced during infection and vaccination, misrepresents studies

healthfeedback Abraham Al-Ahmad & Julie Bettinger

How concerned are you about adverse events related to the vaccines?

medscape: Testimonials from Medical PROFESSIONALS
Avi vs. Steve Kirsch On Vaccines
MRNA TECHNOLOGY, S-PROTEIN AND THE EMERGING DATA, Dr. Robert Malone interviews by Katia Txi.

Robert Malone and Byram Bridle interviewed by Trish Wood.

Rhonda Patrick vs Byram Bridle — Coronavirus Vaccination, referenced is Bridle’s COVID-19 Vaccines and Children:A Scientist’s Guide for Parents, which includes:

The current scientific uncertainties demand that the administration of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine to children, adolescents, and young adults of child-bearing age be paused until proper scientific studies that focus on the safety and pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the vaccines and the vaccine-encoded spike protein can be conducted.

COVID-19 Vaccines and Children:A Scientist’s Guide for Parents, Dr. Byram W. Bridle, PhD

A Global Gain of Function Experiment

Geert Vanden Bossche posits that a mass vaccination regime targeting very specific viral structures during an ongoing pandemic amounts to a global gain of function experiment. Further, that the resulting variants could be able to affect the vaccinated even more than the unvaccinated as the infection may elicit an immune memory response that is ineffective and that can interfere with the working of the general non-memory immune system, the system that may be protecting the young.

DarkHorse Podcast with Geert Vanden Bossche & Bret Weinstein

ZDoggMD mixes some rebuttal with some rather immature ad hominem:

Why This Guy Is Dead Wrong About COVID Vaccines | Bossche Debunked

Edward Nirenberg gets more into the nitty gritty in: Addressing Geert Vanden Bossche’s Claims. Most relevant to any possible virus evolution is the question of to what extent the vaccines are “leaky”. Relevant to safety is if they compromise natural immunity.

Dr. Izzy Gerstenbluth discusses mass vaccination during a pandemic with his colleague, Dr. Ashley Duits:

COVID Science Talks: Mass vaccination during a pandemic | 13-04-2021

Bret and Heather discuss the Facebook shenanigans:

Facebook ‘warns’ us against Geert Vanden Bossch podcast (from Livestream #77)

There are even some, perhaps overfly conspiratorially minded and on the “anti-vax” side, such as Rosemary Frei, who seem to believe that Vanden Bossche constitutes an insider play to add credibility to the current COVID response. Weird.

A similar argument is made by Luc Montagnier, who won a Nobel Prize for the discovery of HIV, some genetic material of which he thinks was inserted into SARS-CoV-2 before it leaked from a lab: Bombshell: Nobel Laureate Reveals that Covid Vaccine is ‘Creating Variants’

Drbeen Medical Lectures: Are Vaccines Causing Variants? (Responding to the French Nobel Laureate)

No real agreement from these three, Dr Byram Bridle, Dr Knut Wittkowski, Dr Mike Yeadon: Vanden Bossche’s Theory: Mass Vaccination Will Breed Dangerous Variants – Fact or Fiction?

Global Paradigm Shift with Michelle Malcolm :: 09 June 2021 — Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines, thinks that Vanden Bossche is correct about the theory but that the response during a pandemic in humans cannot be the same as is taken in the case of cattle (at 45 minutes).

Vaccine rollout will trigger new Covid variants, Oxford scientist warns, adding ‘new layer of complexity’ to pandemic fight

Professor Sir John Bell, Oxford’s regius professor of medicine

And there is some official acknowledgement now:

There are four major risks associated with high numbers of infections. These are an increase in hospitalisations and deaths, more ‘Long-COVID’; workforce absences (including in the NHS); and the increased risk of new variants emerging. The combination of high prevalence and high levels of vaccination creates the conditions in which an immune escape variant is most likely to emerge. The likelihood of this happening is unknown, but such a variant would present a significant risk both in the UK and internationally.

Mathew Crawford does a series of articles on the subject:

This is a text book case of a man made vaccine escape program. Great for Booster revenue. Poor for trust in public health officials that have politicized these obsolete and somewhat useless vaccines.


Gain-of-Function Risks

What are the risks and benefits of gain-of-function experiments?

U.S. halts funding for new risky virus studies, calls for voluntary moratorium

Lab Leak

Yuri Deigin and Bret Weinstein on the possible lab leak, before it became mainstream, and then banned.

Deigin’s original article: Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Function Research.

Chris Martenson of Peak Prosperity

Matt Ridley’s book “Viral”, on the origin of the pandemic, will be published in 2021:


 Peter Daszak’s name seems to come up quite a bit:

Undark: Lab Leak: A Scientific Debate Mired in Politics — and Unresolved

Mainstream now, it seems:

Dr. Fauci disagrees with former CDC Director on COVID lab leak hypothesis (from Livestream #73)

Nicholas Wade: Origin of Covid — Following the Clues

It can’t get too much more mainstream than this letter in Science: Investigate the origins of COVID-19 Bret and Heather discuss it here: What Covid Reveals About our Leaders.

Odds Increase that SARS CoV-2 was Lab Made


H1N1, Smallpox, Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE), SARS, and Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) have documented cases of lab leaks:

A brief, terrifying history of viruses escaping from labs: 70s Chinese pandemic was a lab mistake
The danger of a manmade pandemic sparked by a laboratory escape is not hypothetical

For H1N1 one piece of evidence was missing evolution:

In 1977, H1N1 influenza A virus reappeared after a 20-year absence. Genetic analysis indicated that this strain was missing decades of nucleotide sequence evolution, suggesting an accidental release of a frozen laboratory strain into the general population.

The Re-Emergence of H1N1 Influenza Virus in 1977: A Cautionary Tale for Estimating Divergence Times Using Biologically Unrealistic Sampling

Based on available evidence, the 1977 strain was indeed too closely matched to decades-old strains to likely be a natural occurrence.

The Reemergent 1977 H1N1 Strain and the Gain-of-Function Debate

Soviets Once Denied a Deadly Anthrax Lab Leak. U.S. Scientists Backed the Story.

The 1977 H1N1 Influenza Virus Reemergence Demonstrated Gain-of-Function Hazards

More Resources

Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-1, also

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén